保定环氧地坪漆施工是否平整是直接影响到它的使用价值的，所以在施工当中非常的重要，不过有一点也是我们比较担心的，就是这种保定环氧地坪从表面上看是很难看出它是否平整呢？那么这种保定环氧地坪的施工到底应该如何去判断呢？就让小编来告诉大家。保定环氧地坪的平整度检测主要有两种方法。一种是我们常规使用的方法，通过使用靠尺来丈量保定环氧地坪平整度。一般为2米靠尺，2米范围内落差不超过5mm。

Epoxy floor paint construction is a direct impact on its use value, so it is very important in the construction, but one thing we are more concerned about, is this kind of floor from the surface is very difficult to see whether it is flat? Then, how should the construction of epoxy floor be judged? Let Xiaobian tell you. 

There are two ways to detect the evenness of epoxy floor. One is our regular method of measuring the smoothness of the floor by using a ruler. It is generally 2 meters in length and within 2 meters, the difference is not more than 5mm.

铺在地面上，取最高地和最低点，看落差是多少。

Lay on the ground, take the highest and lowest point, and see the difference.

但用靠尺的方法检测地面的平整度，会存在一些缺陷。如图：

However, there will be some defects in measuring the flatness of the ground by using the ruler. Figure:

当碰到多处落差地段的时候，靠尺法无法表达，并且假如多处落差都小于5mm，那用靠尺法是通过检测的，但实际地面的平整度是不行的（波浪纹）。

When it comes to a lot of falls, the ruler method can not be expressed, and if many falls are less than 5 mm, then the ruler method is used to detect, but the actual ground flatness is not (wavy).

另外一种重庆保定环氧地坪平整度的检测方法是美国混凝土协会和加拿大尺度协会联合推出的F数值。这个检测方法有两个数值，FF为平整度，FL为高差值

Another test method for the flatness of epoxy floors in Chongqing is the F value jointly developed by the American Concrete Association and the Canadian Scale Association. This detection method has two values, FF is flatness and FL is high difference value.

F数值一般的写法是 FF / FL 。如：FF 25 /FL 20 。

The F value is generally written in FF / FL. For example, FF 25 /FL 20.

因为F数值能更正确的表达地坪的平整度，所以在超平地坪中常常使用。但因为F数值的检测方法比拟靠尺法更复杂，并且保定环氧地坪的平整基本是顺平，没有太多的平整度纠纷，所以当前使用最广泛的还是靠尺法

Because the F value can express the evenness of the floor more accurately, it is often used in the super flat floor. But because the F value detection method is more complex than the rule method, and the epoxy floor is basically smooth, there are not too many flatness disputes, so the current most widely used still depends on the rule method.